Table of Contents
Describe the process of research
Writing a paper that describes your research processes can help you develop as a researcher. It can also help you get feedback on how to improve your research findings or approaches.
There are several ways to describe the process of research include using an anecdote, describing the methods used (e.g., questionnaires, interviews), or conducting formal case studies.
An anecdote is just that; one story. An example would be telling someone who is not familiar with your business what all happens during customer service interaction. You could write a paragraph based on anecdotes from past customers and call it attitudethe way they feel about others knowing their business.
Questionnaires have been around for decades and work well when there’s only a few questions to ask, and people know what they want to say. Case study answers involve opinions too, like “how satisfied were you with the product/service” or “what changes did making this purchase make for you?”
Case studies are helpful because you can use data gathering tools such as video cameras or audio recorders to collect information. With these devices, you can actually capture people’s comments and responses.
Research has limitations with capturing conversations. With dialogue focused primarily on conversation leaders and primarily on voices offileter, surveys typically rely on respondents to self-report.
When researchers need to go beyond self-reported data, they often turn to techniques such as observation or interview. In
Include the main research findings
Blog authors often summarize their latest research results in order to reach many readers at once. But these summaries can be ineffective without proper writing skills.
There are several reasons why people struggle to write good headlines or abstracts.
First, they don’t know how to evaluate what information is important for the reader to understand. Second, they assume that because they have conducted experimental research, all relevant data should be included.
But this may not be enough for someone who is reading the report for purposes other than scientific knowledge.
Third, even if the writer identifies key concepts easily, others can miss that there are gaps in the coverage. Finally, despite best efforts, writers sometimes create unclear descriptions that may contribute to ambiguity about the content.
Even when researchers do provide detailed descriptions, those descriptions may need to be revised over time as advances are made. Furthermore, publications with conclusions, recommendations, or both tend to perform worse worldwide.
As such, we now recommend using the first sentence of your article (the result) as the headline instead of the entire article. This way you will capture the reader’s attention and make an effective transition into the text itself.
Review of literature
A review of literature is a comprehensive examination of recent publications in your field of interest. It’s used to determine if current research efforts are focused on developing promising lines of inquiry, or instead are neglected (or simply missing).
Review papers can help you stay up-to-date with new developments in your field.
They can also help you understand where researchers are coming from, their goals, and what they hope to learn.
Finally, reviews give you an opportunity to see how well established different authors are – have they received praise for other works? Have their bodies of work earned them renown?
Reading reviews helps you gauge how confident you should be in their work.
Confidence can come from past successes, good academic credentials, or through peer recognition. For instance, there’s no reason why someone could already have a PhD because she’s published several books and articles.
That would be like working at Google because you wrote a book that people read. There’s only one way to find out!
Focus on recent studies
Rather than focusing on old studies, write about the most relevant studies you have come across in the past few months.
This way you will provide your readers with more current information, and they will be interested to read what has been published within the last couple of months.
Here are some places to find recently published studies :
– The New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) is one of the most well known medical journals. It runs every week under the editorship of Elliot Berger.
He publishes only original articles that are highly beneficial to patients and their doctors.
There are also several ongoing research studies at NEJM Online including ones related to mental health, weight loss, nutrition, cardiac rehabilitation, and many others.
These include randomized controlled trials as well as primary data collection such as surveys and recordings of patient activity.
Moreover, the content from these studies is presented extremely accurately and thoroughly in English language abstracts before the actual publication.
Thus, we can say with certainty that online access to NEJM is a must for any physician or other healthcare professionals who want to keep up to date with groundbreaking clinical research!
Think about public data sets
Another important consideration for researchers is what are they willing to make available as open data. More and more research institutions have access to large amounts of closed data that would be beneficial to other scientists if made publicly available.
If you work at a university, you might consider its repository for scientific articles which contains vast quantities of published material. There may also be internal databases containing information such as experiment designs or results, possibly with statistical analyses.
Make use of these resources by sharing initial findings determined through preliminary screening of your data set before finalizing details regarding where and how to share your final result.
These can serve as warm leads or help build interest in your project before it is complete, raising awareness of your work and increasing exposure for your project.
Conserve time by avoiding redundant efforts and potential complications by collecting and providing access to data already compiled and stored.
Keep sensitive materials such as health records and financial statements on file at each institution you contact, so that when they need information, they know where it is.
This way, you only have to submit one report instead of several times per year.
Let people know who you are and any concerns you have about releasing data. An understanding of why data should be released is very helpful.
Consider using a research lab
Most universities have dedicated labs for conducting scientific experiments. These laboratories are administered by professional scientists who study subjects like biology, chemistry, and biochemistry.
Members of these studies groups look at how science impacts people’s lives, learn new methods to do research, and guide potential scientists through their first steps in creating theories and testing them.
By joining such a group, you can contribute original ideas and be a part of an established team that has resources available if you need help. Many colleges use university-wide libraries that house thousands of books and manuscripts from experts in many fields.
These library accounts are open to everyone and allow you to access information as long as you have a valid username.
There are also online lab management systems that streamline record keeping and organize budgets. Any school with a laboratory class should have one of these.
Think about using a computing cluster
A research cluster is a group of computers from the same office that connect to a common grid or network. Your computer might already come with hardware dedicated to running computational tasks, also known as a “workhorse” system. The sheer number of workhorse systems can make it difficult for you to access your personal files while computing.
By owning the data and services necessary to compute answers, experts are able to deliver answers faster than traditional methods where you would have to wait for results to be delivered by mail or email.
That allows for greater productivity and efficiency in solving problems and completing projects. Also, since organizations need to use less time performing initial analysis, they have more time to devote to looking for solutions and learning new things.
With a large cloud service like Dropbox, everyone involved in the project has access to all documents and information needed to perform their jobs across multiple platforms and devices. This improves communication between team members because people do not have to walk around campus going home for documentation related to their job.
It also helps them feel more motivated to complete tasks because they know others will benefit from what they create. Motivated employees are more likely to produce accurate results and extra benefits for the organization.
Consider using a virtual lab
The ability to capture, organize, and access research results is being increasingly supported by technological advances. More and more scientific studies are published online only-these are known as open access articles. These free of charges for readers without financial support from publication fees.
A distinction is made between accepted manuscripts (also called peer reviewed manuscripts) that have been through the reviewing process and confirmed as worthy of publication, and unsolicited submissions or preprints which may or may not be considered for publication at a later time.
Review processes should provide confidential treatment to submitted works including anonymity and double blind review. Reviewers are in effect saying “I don’t know who this person is, but I’m going to evaluate their work based on its quality.” By having reviewers adopt a persona for the purpose of providing confidentiality, everyone participating in the evaluation can do their job with integrity.
Confidentiality also has benefits for authors. They will feel more secure about sharing their work with professionals they trust, and these documents will be better received when it comes to showing their true selves.
Discussion of research methods
This is one of the most important elements of any scientific paper, as the methodology tells others how to use what was found in the experiment. There are two main sections in the discussion section of the paper: method and results.
Method refers to the procedure followed, while result is the actual finding. For example, if you tested several different people for blood glucose levels after they consumed certain foods, this is the result (higher or lower blood glucose levels) without being dependent on the individual’s insulin level.
The purpose of the study is to investigate whether or not eating breakfast affects blood glucose levels, so it would be inappropriate to compare your findings to those of previous researchers since yours will only add value by comparing them. It’s also helpful to know why previous studies produced conflicting results.
It’s easy to get hung up on details; however, there’s a way to identify relevant bits and throw out irrelevant ones. A detailed description of a process that can be replicated/verified is necessary for other scientists in order to evaluate the validity of the study.
A good narrative is essential here because without a well-written story, anyone reading will lose track of the key parts of the study. Readers need information about where did what questions were asked, who were the participants, how do we know it was reliable, what assumptions have been made, etc.
Results is where you discuss the conclusions you drew from the